A whole lot faster
June 2nd, 2005

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) has “finalized work on new technical specifications that will allow telecoms operators around the world to offer a ‚Äö√Ñ√≤super‚Äö√Ñ√¥ triple play of video,Internet and voice services at speeds up to ten times faster than standard ADSL.The ITU-T Recommendation for very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line 2(VDSL2)will allow operators to compete with cable and satellite providers by offering services such as high definition TV (HDTV),video-on-demand,videoconferencing,high speed Internet access and advanced voice services like VoIP,over a standard copper telephone cable.The new VDSL2 standard delivers up to 100 Mbps both up and downstream,a ten-fold increase over “plain vanilla” ADSL”.

New ITU Standard Delivers 10x ADSL Speeds

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • BlinkList
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • Shadows
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
Comments

The Super computers are whole lot faster. There is no denying. But there is a total waste of resources to denote these resources to the craetion of faster video play, faster voice services and improving the VoIP.

Voice Transmission is well covered by the Telephone Companies that spend 100’s billions of Dollars to buy spectrums from whereever they can. Verizon and Cingular (Cingular is a subsidiary of two other baby bells that compete with Verizon through Cingular). For example they acquired the spectrum with 1900MHz to 1999MHz frequencies from FCC, from New Wave Telecommunications and Cingular also bought the loss producing spectrums from AT&T Wireless at cost of $1900 per AT& T WIRELESS Phone subscriber subscriber. Now these spectrums are about to become obsolte because of the shift to 3G spectrums (2000MHz+) that utilize GDSM system

Why would people still need VOIP or voice transmission through the use of extrordinarily expensive super Computers.

I believe these super Computers should be used primarily as Servers that that are programmed for multitasking and nanotechnology that recieve commands from the cell phones being used by their owners to surf the internet. Ofcourse these cell phone owners could play video games that are stored in these super computers. People rent videos from Video Stores. People pay for voice services to cell phone service Providers. They even subscribe to the digital slow internet service lines of Verizon. There is no reason they would not subscribe to the truly fast Internet service of the type I’ve described herein and at

http://www.spaces.msn.com/members/wirelessbrowsing

I distinctly remember posting a reply to this message last week. I’ve no iea what happened to my reply. I’d post my reply again. I hope my reply stays in.

Who really is International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and how does finalization of any technical specifications would speed up the Internet service to ten times the speed of ADSL. The net Internet service is not faster than the speed of conventional Internet service even if T1 Internet service is used unless multitasking and nanotechnology is used. Do ITU specifications include Multitasking and nano-technology? If not ITU is defrauding the word by its claims and should be barred by FCC from making these Claims. The reason is that if muti-tasking is not part of the picture any speed advantage is lost by the idle CPU time between the clicks because of the need for the processor to wait for the processing Instructions.

The only way multitasking can be introduced is by making the INTERNET SERVICE SERVER based rather than Client Based. That is Server should be no longer required to send any Documents to the Clients but process the commands itself upon recieving them from the clients.

After the bew Internet Infrastructurer is developed there would be no need for any wi-Fi hot spots because all you would need is a cell phone that can send text messages if you desire to surf the INTERNET.

The owners of the cell phones should demand from the makers of the cell phones to support financially the development of such an Internet Infrastructure and Browser. It would not hurt if the owners of cell phones also write to the ITU.

My idea is discussed in the following blogs:

http://www.spaces.msn.com/members/wirelessbrowsing

http://www.newerawisp.blogspot.com

http://www.hackers10.blogspot.com